Modal Sosial Masyarakat dalam Mengatasi Limbah Minyak Jelantah melalui Program Tersenyum
Main Article Content
Abstract
Oil waste is still a problem in the community. The focus of this study is on how the Tersenyum
program can overcome used cooking oil waste, with the aim of explaining the application of the used cooking oil
waste management model in the Tersenyum program . The theory used is Putnam's theory of social capital, which
discusses the importance of social relations and trust in society. Putnam defined social capital as the properties of
social organizations, such as beliefs, norms, and networks, that can increase the efficiency of collective work. The
method used is a case study with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies, observations, and
interviews. This aims to obtain specific and detailed data on the social capital of the community in used cooking
oil waste management through the Tersenyum program . The results of this study are social capital that has
succeeded in encouraging the results of this Tersenyum program , as shown in the network aspect (Bonding
Social Capital, Bridging Social Capital, and Linking Social Capital), where this Tersenyum program can be
socialized and applied in the community. In the normative aspect, the success of this program is based on the
establishment of applicable shared values and rules. Finally, on the aspect of trust, where the positive response of
the community encourages the success of the program Tersenyum program the assimilation of the Tersenyum
program as an act of charity, people have faith that this is a good program.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Jurnal Sosiologi, 12(1), 15–20.
Aditya, Z. F. (2018). Penerapan Modal Sosial Dalam Praktek Peradilan Yang Berbasis
Kepekaan Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY, 25(2), 200.
https://doi.org/10.22219/jihl.v25i2.6002.
Alamsyah, I. E. (2020). T.Care Gelar Aksi Sosial Atasi Masalah Jelantah di Jakarta.
Republika. https://news.republika.co.id/berita/qg542h349/tcare-gelar-aksi-sosialatasi-masalah-jelantah-di-jakarta.
Alfons, Y. (2020). Potensi Minyak Goreng Bekas dari Rumah Tangga untuk Biodiesel.
Katadata. https://databoks.katadata.co.id/datapublish/2020/11/12/potensi-minyakgoreng-bekas-dari-rumah-tangga-untuk-biodiesel.
Auer, A. J. V. Below. L. Nahuelhual. M. Mastrangelo. A. Gonzalez. M. Gluch. M. Vallejos.
L. Staiano. L. Staiano. J. Paruelo. (2020). The role of social capital and collective
actions in natural capital conservation and management. Environmental Science and
Policy, 107, 168–178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.02.024.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023a). KECAMATAN TANAH ABANG DALAM ANGKA 2023.
https://doi.org/31730.2306.
Badan Pusat Statistik. (2023b). Provinsi DKI Jakarta Dalam Angka 2023.
https://doi.org/1102001.31.
Bourdieu. (1986). The Forms of Capital. Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology
of Education, 241–258.
BPS. (2023). Jumlah Rumah Tangga Menurut Kabupaten Kota Di Provinsi DKI Jakarta.
Https://Jakarta.Bps.Go.Id/. https://jakarta.bps.go.id/indicator/12/1055/1/jumlahrumah-tangga-menurut-kabupaten-kota-di-provinsi-dki-jakarta.html.
BURT, R. S. (1992). The Social Structure of Competition. Harvard University Press.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctv1kz4h78.
Coleman, J. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human development. In The American
Journal of Sociology (Vol. 94, pp. 95–120).
Damayanti, F., Supriyatin, T., & Supriyatin, T. (2021). Pemanfaatan Limbah Minyak Jelantah
Sebagai Upaya Peningkatan Kepedulian Masyarakat Terhadap Lingkungan.
Dinamisia : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 5(1), 161–168.
https://doi.org/10.31849/dinamisia.v5i1.4434.
Dumas, S., Sahrul, M., Sokhivah, & Rudiatin, E. (2022). Strategi Fundraising Dalam program
Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (Studi Kasus Program “Tersenyum” Rumah Sosial Kutub
Jakarta Selatan). KHIDMAT SOSIAL: Journal of Social Work and Social Services,
3(1), 51–60.
JSA (Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas): Volume 10, No. 1 (April) 2024
69
Fathy, R. (2019a). Modal Sosial: Konsep, Inklusivitas dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal
Pemikiran Sosiologi, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v6i1.47463.
Fathy, R. (2019b). Modal Sosial: Konsep, Inklusivitas dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Jurnal
Pemikiran Sosiologi, 6(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.22146/jps.v6i1.47463.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Trust : the social virtues and the creation of prosperity (Ruslani, Ed.).
Qalam.
Gibbs, J. P., & Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of Social Theory. Social Forces, 69(2),
625. https://doi.org/10.2307/2579680.
Godoy, R., Reyes-García, V., Huanca, T., Leonard, W. R., Olvera, R. G., Bauchet, J., Ma, Z.,
St. John, J., Miodowski, M., Rios, O. Z., Vadez, V., & Seyfreid, C. (2007). The Role
of Community and Individuals in the Formation of Social Capital. Human Ecology,
35(6), 709–721. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10745-006-9106-1.
Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6),
1360–1380. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776392.
Haridison, A. (2013). MODAL SOSIAL DALAM PEMBANGUNAN. Journal Ilmu Sosial,
Politik Dan Pemerintahan, 2(2), 1–9.
John, C. (2019). RESEARCH DESIGN, Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods
Approaches (Fourth Edi). SAGE Publication.
Ostrom, E. (2000). Collective Action and the Evolution of Social Norms. Journal of Economic
Perspectives, 14(3), 137–158. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.14.3.137.
Peraturan Pemerintah. (2012). Peraturan Pemerintah (PP) Nomor 81 Tahun 2012 tentang
Pengelolaan Sampah Rumah Tangga Dan Sampah Sejenis Sampah Rumah Tangga.
Peraturan.Bpk.Go.Id. https://peraturan.bpk.go.id/Details/5295/pp-no-81-tahun-2012.
Putnam, R. (1995). THE PROSPEROUS COMMUNITY Social Capital and Public Life.
World Economy and International Relations, 4, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.20542/0131-
2227-1995-4-77-86.
Putnam, R. D. (1993). What makes democracy work? National Civic Review, 82(2), 101–107.
https://doi.org/10.1002/ncr.4100820204.
Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. Proceedings of the 2000 ACM Conference on Computer
Supported Cooperative Work, 357. https://doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990.
Saputra, T., Astuti, W., Nasution, S. R., & Zuhdi, S. (2022). PARTISIPASI MASYARAKAT
DALAM PROGRAM SEDEKAH SAMPAH DAN MINYAK JELANTAH. Jurnal
Kebijakan Publik, 13(4), 246–251.
https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.31258/jkp.v13i4.8147.
Sekarningrum, B., Sugandi, Y. S., & Yunita, D. (2021). Penerapan Model Pengelolaan
Sampah “Pojok Kangpisman.” Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat,
3(3), 548. https://doi.org/10.24198/kumawula.v3i3.29740.
Shapiro, E. (2022). A Protective Canopy: Religious and Social Capital as Elements of a Theory
of Religion and Health. Journal of Religion and Health, 61(6), 4466–4480.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01207-8.
Siisiäinen, M., & Martti. (2000). Two Concepts of Social Capital: Bourdieu vs. Putnam.
Sugiono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan : Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan
R&D. Alfabeta.
Syahli, R., & Sekarningrum, B. (2017). PENGELOLAAN SAMPAH BERBASIS MODAL
SOSIAL MASYARAKAT. Sosiogobal: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Sosiologi
Is, 1(2), 143–151. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.24198/jsg.v1i2.13309.
Syahra, R. (2003). Modal sosial: Konsep dan aplikasi. Jurnal Masyarakat Dan Budaya, 5(1),
1–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14203/jmb.v5i1.256.
Toni, R. (2019). Dinas LH Bangun Lima Tempat Pembuangan Sampah Khusus Limbah B3.
Beritajakarta. https://m.beritajakarta.id/read/65710/dinas-lh-bangun-lima-tempatpembuangan-sampah-khusus-limbah-b3.
JSA (Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas): Volume 10, No. 1 (April) 2024
70
Tuominen, M., & Haanpää, L. (2022). Young People’s Well-Being and the Association with
Social Capital, i.e. Social Networks, Trust and Reciprocity. Social Indicators
Research, 159(2), 617–645. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-021-02762-z.
Tzanakis, M. (2013). Social capital in Bourdieu’s, Coleman’s and Putnam’s theory: empirical
evidence and emergent measurement issues. Educate, 13(2).
Woolcock, M. (1998). Social Capital and Economic Development: Toward a Theoretical
Synthesis and Policy Framework. Theory and Society, 21(2), 151–208.
https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006884930135