Pola Asuh Otoriter dan Implikasinya terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Mahasiswa Makassar: Kajian Sosiologi

Authors

  • Atma Ras Atma Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Dimas Ario Sumilih Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Hukum, Universitas Negeri Makassar, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Nuvida RAF Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Musrayani Usman Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Hariashari Rahim Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andi Nurlela Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia
  • Andini Aprilia Ananda Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik, Universitas Hasanuddin, Makassar, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.25077/jsa.11.2.191-204.2025

Keywords:

Authoritarian Parenting, Habitus, Symbolic Domination

Abstract

This study aims to examine authoritarian parenting patterns and their implications for students' social identities. Using a qualitative approach with a case study strategy, this study involved six students from families who experienced authoritarian parenting. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews and thematic analysis using Max Weber's theory of social action and Pierre Bourdieu's concepts of habitus and symbolic domination. The results of the study show that authoritarian parenting patterns do not only stem from religious values and the social status of parents, but are also passed down through family social structures that are not reflective of changing times. Parenting is carried out through restrictions on freedom of expression, symbolic supervision, and the use of cultural values such as siri na pacce as a moral framework. However, in some cases, these noble values are interpreted rigidly, thereby limiting the space for dialogue between parents and children. The implications include symbolic alienation, identity crisis, and the emergence of manipulative behavior and symbolic resistance outside the home. This study emphasizes the importance of a more dialogical and adaptive parenting approach in modern social dynamics.

References

Adela, N., Arif, E., & Zetra, A. (2021). Hubungan Kompetensi Komunikasi Dosen terhadap Motivasi Belajar Mahasiswa. Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas, 7(1), 67–80. https://jsa.fisip.unand.ac.id/index.php/jsa/article/view/44.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Aproaches (3rd ed). Sage Publications.

Darussalam, F. I. (2021). Siri’ Na Pacce Dan Identitas Kebudayaan. 14(1), 1–5. https://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id.

Davidov, M., Oren-Gabai, L., & Abu-Asaad. (2021). Parental religious beliefs and practices and their relations to psychological and child adjustment: The role of ethnic differences. Journal of Family Psychology, 35(4), 466–476.

Forsberg, S. (2022). The symbolic gift of education in migrant families and compromises in school choice. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(5), 700–717. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2022.2051432.

Franceschelli, M., & O’Brien, M. (2014). ‘Islamic Capital’ and Family Life: The Role of Islam in Parenting. Sociology, 48(6), 1190–1206. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038038513519879.

Hamid Habbe, A., Christian, F., Rasyid, S., Timang Street, H., & Raya, P. (2023). The Portrait of Good Governance in the Framework of Religious and Cultural Philosophy. In International Economics and Business Conference (IECON) (Vol. 1, Issue 1).

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385150641.

Hidayat, D. D., & Susanto, D. D. (2024a). SEBASA Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia. 7(1), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.29408/sbs.v7i1.

Isabelle, R., James J.G, & Moïra, M. (2023). Emotion regulation and parenting. Cambridge, University Press.

Ketaren, , D.A.S. (2023). Penghayatan identitas gender pada perempuan karir suku Batak. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 4(2), 379–389.

Marhani, Prihartanti, N., & Purwandari, E. (2021). The Siri’ Value in Bugis Tribe Family Parenting. Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 6(1, 77–87.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook) (3rd ed). Sage Publications.

Nur, R. J., Komariah, S., & Wilodati, W. (2024). Siri’ Na Pacce and The Reconstruction of Gender Roles: The Dynamics of Modern-Day Womanhood in Bugis-Makassar Society. Potret Pemikiran, 28(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.30984/pp.v28i1.2893.

Nur, R., & Widayati, C. (2021). Local Wisdom of Bugis Makassar Siri ’na Pacce from Millennials Glasses.

Özdemir, T. (2025). Young girls’ struggles and strategies in the family field. Turkish Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/14683849.2025.2501585.

Papadopoulos, T., & Roumpakis, A. (2017). Family as a Socio-economic Actor in the Political Economies of East and South East Asian Welfare Capitalisms. Social Policy and Administration, 51(6), 857–875. https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.12336.

Pierre Bourdieu. (1990). Title: The Logic of Practice Author: Pierre Bourdieu Translator: Richard Nice Publisher: Stanford University Press Year: 1990 ISBN: 9780804717568. Stanford University Press.

Rahmaini, I. S. (2021). Pola Interaksi Anak dengan Ayah Tiri dalam Keluarga Remarriage. Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas, 7(1), 11–23. https://doi.org/10.25077/jsa.7.1.11-23.2021.

Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. Yale University Press.

Thi, G., & Tran, T. (2018). Sharing cultural values across generations in Vietnamese Australian families.

Tian, F. F., & Jing, Y. (2021). The reproduction of working class? Social mobility and the stratification of parenting practice in urban Chinese families. Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00147-w.

Weber, M. (1978). Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology (Vol. 1). University of California Press, Berkeley, USA.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-11

How to Cite

Atma, A. R., Dimas Ario Sumilih, Nuvida RAF, Musrayani Usman, Hariashari Rahim, Andi Nurlela, & Andini Aprilia Ananda. (2025). Pola Asuh Otoriter dan Implikasinya terhadap Kehidupan Sosial Mahasiswa Makassar: Kajian Sosiologi . Jurnal Sosiologi Andalas, 11(2), 191–204. https://doi.org/10.25077/jsa.11.2.191-204.2025

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Atma Ras Atma, Dimas Ario Sumilih, Nuvida RAF, Musrayani Usman, Hariashari Rahim, Andi Nurlela, Andini Aprilia Ananda

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.